Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1002045
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T07:46:14+00:00 2026-05-16T07:46:14+00:00

Is assembler a translator or transcriptor? I think it is a translator because when

  • 0

Is assembler a translator or transcriptor?
I think it is a translator because when it converts assembly language to machine code, then that code can be understood by hardware.
Could somebody explain this concept to me?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T07:46:15+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 7:46 am

    Wiki says:

    If the translator translates assembly language to machine code such kind of translator is called assembler.

    I totally agree with it. Machine code is a programing language.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

it's assembler right? can someone please point out the progression that we've had in
How is assembly faster than compiled languages if both are translated to machine code?
Can someone please translate this high-level code into IA-32 assembly without using any global
I have this assembler code, which I'm supposed to translate into machine code in
We have developed a .NET Assembly that stores language translation information and it needs
I have an array of hex codes that translate into assembly instructions and I
I am using the Microsoft ARM Assembler v15.00.20720 (armasm.exe) that came with Visual Studio
How much faster is the following assembler code: shl ax, 1 Versus the following
I am looking for small assembler translator for a student project. The problem is
I understand somewhat how int a = b+abs(c) can be translated to simple assembly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.