Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4037876
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T12:24:12+00:00 2026-05-20T12:24:12+00:00

Is constructing and using a manual lookup ( ILookup<T> ) approach any faster than

  • 0

Is constructing and using a manual lookup (ILookup<T>) approach any faster than using a join with Join or GroupJoin on a local IEnumerable<T> sequence in LINQ?

I read somewhere that the compiler actually translates the inner sequence of Join and GroupJoin to ILookup<T> anyway.

What would ILookup<T> benefits of using it on it’s own be?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T12:24:13+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 12:24 pm

    It depends. If you’re working with objects that are DataContext based, then the join gets translated all the way down into the SQL server via the select statement. IF its a POCO (or more specifically a Plain Old CLR collection) or something else, then yes, its utilized as ILookup.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My project is re engineering a an HTML data grid constructing using SQL query
I'm constructing a small iphone app and using a singleton to store and update
Is there a way to mock object construction using JMock in Java? For example,
I'm creating a form using the Content Construction Kit (CCK) in Drupal5. I've added
using MVP, what is the normal order of construction and dependency injection. normally you
I am using Direct3D to display a number of I-sections used in steel construction.
Where I work, people mostly think that objects are best initialised using C++-style construction
Given: Constructing an ADO Connection object from one thread and giving it to another
I'm constructing a simple form in ERB but the HTML produced by the text_field
I am constructing a search page with a textbox and a button for now,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.