Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8455853
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T12:23:39+00:00 2026-06-10T12:23:39+00:00

Is increment_counter indirectly manipulating lock_version ? I’m testing against concurrency, and I notice lock_version

  • 0

Is increment_counter indirectly manipulating lock_version?

I’m testing against concurrency, and I notice lock_version is incrementing. Even though, I am not rescuing from ActiveRecord::StaleObjectError.

http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Locking/Optimistic.html says

"Active Records support optimistic locking if the field lock_version is present." 

Does this mean increment_counter is triggering a rescue on ActiveRecord::StaleObjectError automatically?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T12:23:40+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 12:23 pm

    The field lock_version always gets incremented on save when updating a record. Say you have a record with a lock_version of 3. When you save it, it will try doing something as follows:

    UPDATE some_table SET foo = "bar", lock_version = 4 WHERE id = some_id AND lock_version = 3
    

    The ActiveRecord::StaleObjectError gets thrown if the amount of rows updated is equal to zero. Essentially if the rows updated equals zero means that another request already updated the record. For this reason the lock_version always increments.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Should we learn all CSS (till version3) even if all browser don't support and
i am really struggling to load some numeric floating point data from a file
I'm trying to use target-counter to describe references. I found out about it from
I wrote the following program for alternatively incrementing and doubling a counter(increment first) using
from google.appengine.ext import db class Parent(db.Model): app_id = db.StringProperty() class Child(db.Model): app_id = db.ReferenceProperty(Parent,collection_name='children')
I'm trying to improve my bucket sort for large number over 10000.I'm not quite
Possible Duplicate: Why does this code not increment a counter properly? I have a
I am using python to increment a counter in 5 minute intervals in redis
I intend to create a realtime counter. So one user can incremenet the counter
I made a simple counter, but it increments by 2 instead of 1. $handle

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.