Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6221965
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:13:43+00:00 2026-05-24T08:13:43+00:00

Is it a bad idea to inject data into an itemrenderer. The reason I

  • 0

Is it a bad idea to inject data into an itemrenderer. The reason I ask this is because the state of each item is dependent on different changing data sources. So the original data is used to just display a new item, but there could be two to three other data collections that would be needed to determine the item’s behavior. Is there a better way to do this? Should I be creating a custom DataGroup with the other data sources as properties on this custom container and then reference the data sources from the itemrenderer to the parent?

Also, I’m using swiz if this matters or helps at all.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:13:44+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:13 am

    Indeed, it’s generally not a good idea, it’s much better to set the data property of the renderer, and just make sure that the data contains everything the renderer needs.

    If the renderer needs information from other data collections, just set the item’s data before assigning it to renderer.

    The way, I see it should be like that:

    Controller
    – Data collection 1
    – Data collection 2
    – Data collection 3

    First, the controller gathers data from the three data collection, and creates some data D based on them

    Finally the controller assigns this data D to the renderer. That way the renderer has no dependency to other external data collection.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm mostly just curious if this is a bad idea for some reason. I'm
Is this a bad idea? Private Class GH_DataStructureEnumerator(Of Q As Types.IGH_Goo) Implements IEnumerable(Of Q)
if this is a bad idea, how to allocate memory in the function?
Why are 'out' parameters in .NET a bad idea? I was recently asked this,
I know it's generally a bad idea to do queries like this: SELECT *
Is it a good or bad idea to make setters in java return this?
I've heard that it is a bad idea to do something like this. But
Is it a bad idea to use printStackTrace() in Android Exceptions like this? }
ruby somescript.rb somehugelonglistoftextforprocessing is this a bad idea? rather should i create a separate
Is this a bad idea? Is there a better way to achieve the same

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.