Is it a bad practice to do what the code below does? Will bad things happen to me for writing it?
Edit: this is just an example. I would not use dbms_output for any real error reporting.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE my_package
AS
PROCEDURE master;
END;
/
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY my_package
AS
my_global_interrupt EXCEPTION;
PROCEDURE my_private_procedure
IS
BEGIN
-- in case some flag is raised, raise exception to stop process and prepare for resume
RAISE my_global_interrupt;
END;
PROCEDURE master
IS
BEGIN
my_private_procedure;
EXCEPTION
WHEN my_global_interrupt THEN
dbms_output.put_line('global interrupt, ');
-- prepare to resume
END;
END;
/
On the contrary globally defined user exceptions is good practice. Consider the following skeleton of a package body.
The use of globally declared exceptions makes exception handling in the
masterprocedure easier.Also, bear in mind that sometimes we want to propagate the exception beyond the package, to say a program which calls our publicly declared procedure. We can do that by defining our exceptions in the package spec. This means other proecdures can reference them…
We can also associate such exceptions with specific error numbers, so that they are recognisable even if the calling procedure doesn’t explicitly handled them.
That’s (slightly) more helpful than the generic
ORA-06510error.