Is it a best practice to put Javadoc comments in JUnit test classes and methods? Or is the idea that they should be so easy to read and simple that it is unnecessary to provide a narrative of the test intent?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
I personally use javadoc comments sparingly as I find they increase the on-screen clutter. If I can name a class, function or variable in a more self-descriptive way then I will in preference to a comment. An excellent book to read on this topic is Clean Code by Robert C. Martin (a.k.a Uncle Bob).
My personal preference is to make both the class and methods self descriptive i.e.
One advantage of this approach is that it is easy to see in the junit output what is failing before browsing the code.