Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8221805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T14:03:38+00:00 2026-06-07T14:03:38+00:00

Is it a good idea to use self-invoking functions to hide functions and variables

  • 0

Is it a good idea to use self-invoking functions to hide functions and variables like this?

Is there a better way?

Is it slower than declaring functions and variables on the same level?

validator = require 'json-schema'

actionA = do ->
  schema =
    type : 'object'
    properties:
      param1 : { type : 'string', required : true }
      param2 : { type : 'string', required : true }

  encode = (results) -> JSON.parse(results)

  (params, callback) ->
    res = validator.validate params, schema
    value = if res.valid then encode(params) else false
    callback value

actionB = do ->
  schema =
    type : 'object'
    properties:
      param1 : { type : 'integer', required : true }
      param2 : { type : 'integer', optional : true }

  encode = (results) -> JSON.stringify(results)

  (params, callback) ->
    res = validator.validate params, schema
    value = if res.valid then encode(params) else false
    callback value

Thank you for your help.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T14:03:40+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 2:03 pm

    Yes, I believe it’s fine. In fact, when you create “classes” in CoffeeScript

    class Test
      constructor: ->
        @foo = 'bar'
    

    it compiles to this:

    var Test;
    
    Test = (function() {
    
      function Test() {
        this.foo = 'bar';
      }
    
      return Test;
    
    })();
    

    Which primarily does the same thing as the code you posted.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When is it a good idea to use something like CRDT instead of paxos
Is it a good idea to use experimental CSS-properties like border-radius , text-shadow ,
When is it a good idea to use more than one DBMS? What are
Is it a good idea to use MongoDB in .NET desktop application?
Is it a good idea to use sockets to send data between two servers,
I was wondering if it were a good idea to use an initializer list
I'm curious if it's a good idea to use a union when accessing Win32
This seems like a simple question to ask but, is it generally a good
I'm wondering if it's a good idea to use DFS to sync content across
Is it a good idea to use while loop instead of a cursor? What

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.