Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6389235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T03:22:42+00:00 2026-05-25T03:22:42+00:00

Is it a good practice to pass IDisposable as a parameter to a method

  • 0

Is it a good practice to pass IDisposable as a parameter to a method and dispose it inside that method. This is sort of inevitable when you have to use several threads. Well, the best practices says the owner(caller) should dispose it.

E.g.

public void MyMethod(MyClass reader){
    using(reader){
        //some code
    }
}

What if the owner (creating thread) no longer exist? E.g.

interface IReader : IDisposable {
    string Read();
}

public class MyReader : IReader {

    public string Read()
    {
        return "hellow world";
    }
    public void Dispose()
    {
        //dispose code
    }
}

Here you find the problem…

public void Start() {
    MyReader[] readerSet = new MyReader[5];
    for (int i = 0; i < readerSet.Length; i++) {
        readerSet[i] = new MyReader();
    }
    foreach (IReader reader in readerSet) {
        ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(new WaitCallback(Run), reader);
    }
    //exit after creating threads
}


public void Run(Object objReader) {
    IReader reader = (IReader)objReader;
    using (reader) { 
    //use the reader
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T03:22:42+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 3:22 am

    I think you would be better off taking a creation delegate to guarantee disposal of the object.

    Example

    public void Start() {
        var makeReader = new Func<IReader>(() => new MyReader()); 
        for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
            ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(Run, makeReader);
        }
    }    
    
    public void Run(Object state) {
        var makeReader = (Func<IReader>)state;
        using (var reader = makeReader()) { 
            //use the reader
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it good practice to have a class constructor that uses default parameters, or
It is good practice to use the main method to test a java/.net class?
Is it good practice to have a unit test that specifies how long a
Is it good practice to have more than one try{} catch{} statement per method?
i read in one article that its not a good practice to pass dataset
What good-practice-indicating idioms do you look for in a sequence of method invocations, as
Is it a good practice to comment code that is removed? For example: //
I was just wondering if this approach looks like a good practice for apps
I wonder if it is a good practice to use JUnit's @Ignore. And how
In domain driven design, it appears to be a good practice to use Factories

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.