Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1069649
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T20:26:53+00:00 2026-05-16T20:26:53+00:00

Is it a good way to try something useless just to see if a

  • 0

Is it a good way to try something useless just to see if a particular exception is thrown by this code ?
I want to do something when the exception is thrown, and nothing otherwise.

try {  
    new BigDecimal("some string"); // This do nothing because the instance is ignored  
} catch (NumberFormatException e) {  
    return false; // OK, the string wasn't a well-formed decimal  
}  
return true;

There is too many preconditions to test, and the constructor BigDecimal() is always checking them all, so this seem the simplest method.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T20:26:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 8:26 pm

    Generally, this practice should be avoided. But since there is no utility method isValidBigDecimal(..), that’s the way to go.

    As Peter Tillemans noted in the comments, place this code in a utility method called isValidBigDecimal(..). Thus your code will be agnostic of the way of determining the validity, and you can even later switch to another method.

    Boris Pavlović suggested an option to check that using a 3rd party library (commons-lang). There’s one more useful method there, which I use whenever I need to verify numbers – NumberUtils.isNumber(..)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.