Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3315666
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:22:37+00:00 2026-05-17T22:22:37+00:00

Is it acceptable/good-style to simplify this function: bool TryDo(Class1 obj, SomeEnum type) { if

  • 0

Is it acceptable/good-style to simplify this function:

bool TryDo(Class1 obj, SomeEnum type)
{
    if (obj.CanDo(type))
    {
        return Do(obj);
    }
    else
    {
        return false;
    }
}

as:

bool TryDo(Class1 obj, SomeEnum type)
{
    return obj.CanDo(type) && Do(obj);
}

The second version is shorter but arguably less intuitive.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:22:38+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:22 pm

    What I would code is :

    return obj.CanDo(type) ? Do(obj) : false;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is generally considered good coding style in C++ where you use types from
is it acceptable/good-practice to use the method chaining pattern on value objects (like, returning
In terms of good code, is it acceptable to combine set and get methods
After long investigations and reading this question I still didn't get a good solution
Is it acceptable to submit from an http form through https? It seems like
Is it ever acceptable to have a memory leak in your C or C++
Is it acceptable to make more than 1 facade class (not instance) in a
Is it acceptable to add types to the std namespace. For example, I want
Is it acceptable to add special, but unnecessary, content based on a user's web
Similar to Is hard-coding literals ever acceptable? , but I'm specifically thinking of magic

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.