Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 848915
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T07:01:05+00:00 2026-05-15T07:01:05+00:00

Is it bad idea to have static CComPtr member variables in an application. Since

  • 0

Is it bad idea to have static CComPtr member variables in an application.
Since we cannt control destruction of static variable and it can happen after CoUninitialze .

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T07:01:06+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:01 am

    Provided you take the appropriate precautions, then using a CComPtr as a static member is not inherently evil.

    By “appropriate precautions”, I mean you should consider:

    • Mutexing access to it;
    • Ensuring that it has been initialised
      before usage;
    • Maintining a mutexed, static instance count for your own class;
    • Ensuring that CComPtr::Release is called in your class’ own FinalRelease method when the instance count reaches zero.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it a bad idea to use exception chaining when throwing RemoteExceptions? We have
Is it a bad idea (and if why?) to add a a column to
Why are 'out' parameters in .NET a bad idea? I was recently asked this,
I know it's generally a bad idea to do queries like this: SELECT *
Quick question: Would it be a good or a bad idea to implement my
It's generally accepted that copy and paste programming is a bad idea, but what
Lots of developers think that testing private methods is a bad idea. However, all
Either I had a bad dream recently or I am just too stupid to
I constantly hear how bad reflection is to use. While I generally avoid reflection
I'm doing something bad in my ASP.NET app. It could be the any number

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.