Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7843763
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T16:39:16+00:00 2026-06-02T16:39:16+00:00

Is it best to NOT label a form component (or any other component for

  • 0

Is it best to NOT label a form component (or any other component for that matter) unless you have a need to do so e.g. if you want to be able to reliably distinguish one component from another?

When I see examples of reference components I am always seeing them with a preceding colon e.g. “:dialog” rather than “dialog” or “form:dialog”. Is not naming the form and then specifying the component using a preceding colon the best practice?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T16:39:18+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 4:39 pm

    If you don’t specify the id of the form because you don’t need to reference it by a client ID right now, then it will technically not harm to omit it, because JSF will autogenerate one in any way.

    From inside an ID-less form, for example, you can always reference the parent form as @form in execute and render attributes of <f:ajax> to signal that you want to submit and/or render the entire parent form.

    <f:ajax execute="@form" render="@form" />
    

    But if you need to reference for example another form or one of its child components on ajax render, then you should give that form a fixed ID, so that you will be able to reference it by client ID.

    Another reason which we’re experiencing in real world projects is that automated web unit testing software such as Selenium really requires a form with a fixed ID, because it needs to find the input fields and submit buttons by their name attribute which is also composed based on the JSF form ID. If the JSF form ID is not specified, then the input field name is unpredictable on every deploy/request and thus untestable.

    All with all, the “best practice” is basically: “only if you need it”. I myself am just getting used to always specify the ID of NamingContainer, UIInput and UICommand components. “You never know”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Maybe that's not exactly the solution i need, but this is what i want
First of all, sorry about that title. I'm not the best at writing those
We need to have non-developers create dozens of input forms with XAML. The best
I want to have display-only fields to render data that's never going to be
I have a WinForms data entry form that will have upwards of 1500 questions.
I have a form partial that looks like this: <%= form_for(@pool) do |f| %>
I have a HTML snippet as follows, I want to take the 'article-form' div,
I want my application to fill in a single field in a form that
I have a large form that consists of all the input (text, checkbox, radio,
I have a TabControl that has four tabs: <TabControl> <TabItem><TextBox/></TabItem> <TabItem><UserControl/></TabItem> <TabItem><Label/></TabItem> <TabItem><Image/></TabItem> </TabControl>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.