Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8173937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T22:19:28+00:00 2026-06-06T22:19:28+00:00

Is it better / faster inside an event listener to use this or event.target

  • 0

Is it better / faster inside an event listener to use this or event.target

I’ve been writing code like this (example is jQuery):

jQuery('input').bind('keyup', function (e) {
 var j = jQuery(e.target);
 foo(j.attr('id') , j.val() );
});

And I was told to replace e.target with this because it’s “better”. Is there really any advantage to one or the other?

I use target because it’s a more general solution as it works for delegated events. I’m having trouble benchmarking because my tests get cluttered with the binding (Although, obviously, in this case the difference would be too small to matter anyway)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T22:19:29+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 10:19 pm

    The one isn’t better than the other, but they do different things: this refers to the element the event is attached to, while event.target is the element that invoked the event.

    For example

    div id=foo   
       div id=bar
    

    when click is attached to foo, and bar is clicked, the event will bubble up to foo. In the event this will refer to foo and event.target to bar

    In the end it depends on which element you need to handle.

    There’s a small example on api.jquery.com/event.target that illustrates event.target. Here’s a small sample that uses that example, but which also displays this: http://jsbin.com/adifan/edit#javascript,html,live

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just an academic question. I'm curious what version of this code is better (faster)
What is better / faster: For example: STATIC / direct HTML: <?php for($i=0;$i<$sth;$i++) {
Is there better use of available storage space and faster network access using the
How fast is glUseProgram()? Is there anything better (faster)?: Here are my thoughts: Use
Is it better (faster & more efficient) to use alloc or autorelease initializers. E.g.:
What is typically regarded as more Pythonic/better/faster to use, the reverse method or the
I have a lot of code in which I do something like this bool
Is it generally better/faster to do: if (condition) return a else if (condition2) return
Which one is better/faster/preferred 1: mov eax, 5 push eax mov eax, [someAddress] push
which is better or faster, A or B? std::deque<Myclass> queue; ... // do something

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.