Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 227379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:35:37+00:00 2026-05-11T19:35:37+00:00

Is it faster for the randomize the sort order of a large set of

  • 0

Is it faster for the randomize the sort order of a large set of results on the MySQL server or after I have received the data in PHP?

Does anyone have any data to backup either side, or even anecdotal experience?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:35:37+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    My educated guess is that MySQL wins hands down. It’s made to handle data this way. The sheer overhead of having to move all the data over to PHP for sorting gives it an advantange to boot.

    You can find out for yourself by doing some benchmarking, of course.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

What is faster way to manipulate myInput string in order to have myOutput string?
Which is faster: Union or Concat ? I don't care about the order of
Just wondering weather its faster, if you have lots (~several hundred to a thousand)
What is faster in SQL Server 2005/2008, a Stored Procedure or a View? EDIT:
what will be faster? SELECT * FROM or SELECT specified FROM background: table have
What is faster: writing PHP code using functions or writing it as pure script?
which structure returns faster result and/or less taxing on the host server, flat file
Which is faster and why? Selecting div (for plugin needs) by $('div[data-something]') or $('div.something')
Which is faster for millions of records: Permanent Table or Temp Tables? I have
Not just faster but better both in speed and using resources/memory. I have an

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.