Is it good practice to make sure that all abstract classes have names prefixed with “Abstract”?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Is it good practice to make sure that all abstract classes have names prefixed with “Abstract”?
You can but I tend not to do this since it is an implementation detail.
I don’t like adding implementation detail information in the names of types and identifiers as that kind of information may change in the future. In my opinion it is best to name things what they are, not how they happen to be implemented.