Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8015563
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T20:17:27+00:00 2026-06-04T20:17:27+00:00

Is it (in a performant way) possible to define fallback methods in JavaScript? For

  • 0

Is it (in a performant way) possible to define “fallback” methods in JavaScript?

For example

function MyObject () {
   /* what do i have to add here to have my defaultMethod? */
}

var obj = new MyObject ();
obj.doesntExistInMyObject (); // I want defaultMethod to be called
obj.doesntExistEither (); // I want defaultMethod to be called, too

I.e.: I want defaultMethod to be called whenever I write obj.calledMethod (); and obj.calledMethod == undefined, but I do not want to check for undefined in the calling code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T20:17:28+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 8:17 pm

    JavaScript doesn’t currently have that feature. It may well in the next version, though, via proxies. So until then, to do this you’d have to do something fairly ugly, like:

    MyObject.prototype.ex = function(fname) {
        var f    = this[fname],
            args = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 1);
        if (typeof f === "function") {
            return f.apply(this, args);
        }
        return this.defaultMethod.apply(this, args);
    };
    

    …and use it like this:

    var obj = new MyObject();
    obj.ex("doesntExistInMyObject", "arg", "arg");
    

    (ex for “execute”, since call is too easily confused with Function#call.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have tried every way possible and can't seem to limit the scope_to method
I have a Entity Framework design with a few tables that define a graph.
Here is my problem: I have a sequence S of (nonempty but possibly not
Possible Duplicate: Specifying an index (non unique key) using JPA Is there a way
I have the following situation: void function(params) { #ifdef _MULTIPLAYER if (isConnected) { if
I have an object: function Shape(color, position, coordinates){ this.color = color; this.position = position;
Is there any performance hit for writing a function such that local var statements
Here is a method from a class in some of Apple's example code .
I'm a Haskell beginner and have to define a series of known statuses that
Possible Duplicate: Solution for overloaded operator constraint in .NET generics I have a problem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.