Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6943429
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T13:09:17+00:00 2026-05-27T13:09:17+00:00

Is it more efficient on basic auth to use: require group abc or require

  • 0

Is it more efficient on basic auth to use:

require group abc

or

require user bob, jill, fred, pam, etc

where the group flat file contains the valid usernames?

Or does it not matter?

I am looking for an easy way to manage an extensive list of valid users for http authentication.

Thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T13:09:18+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 1:09 pm

    If different users have different privileges, groups will be much easier to manage instead of editing all related configuration files everytime a user is added.

    However, if all users have the same privileges, you don’t need to require any specific user or group, you could just go with require valid-user so that any user is allowed access to the resource.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Which is more efficient? SELECT theField FROM theTable GROUP BY theField or SELECT DISTINCT
Is it better (more efficient, faster, more secure, etc) to (A) cache data that
Which is more efficient for the compiler and the best practice for checking whether
Is there a more efficient way to convert an HTMLCollection to an Array, other
Is it more efficient for a class to access member variables or local variables?
Is there a more efficient way to clamp real numbers than using if statements
What is more efficient -- having a IDbTransaction in the .net code or handling
Is there are more efficient way than the following for selecting the third parent?
The DataReader is more efficient than a DataTable if you only need to show
What is the more efficient way to create a web video chat ? What

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.