Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1107605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T01:57:42+00:00 2026-05-17T01:57:42+00:00

Is it necessary to use reinterpret_cast< char*> when reading from a binary file. Since

  • 0

Is it necessary to use reinterpret_cast< char*> when reading from a binary file. Since I found that a explicit typecast worked as well e.g. (char*), sizeof(int).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T01:57:43+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 1:57 am

    both reinterpret_cast and the C-style explicit cast do exactly the same thing in your context. I prefer reinterpret_cast as it makes the nastiness more explicit when reading the code.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 542k
  • Answers 542k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use: SELECT p.id as a, p.url as b, t.id as… May 17, 2026 at 3:22 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There are two parts to the problem First Issue You… May 17, 2026 at 3:19 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I thought I'd show the regex approach, too. It doesn't… May 17, 2026 at 3:18 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Just because I've never read binary files before I wrote a program that reads
Is it necessary to use Nothing keyword to initialize a DataSet in VB.NET?
Is it absolutely necessary to use "arrows" to show association between an actor and
Is it necessary to use a period for single sentence notification boxes? Even though
When is it necessary to use a wildcard * to reset or initialize all
Why is it necessary to use the new keyword when a method shall be
I'm relatively new in C#, & I'm wondering when to use Delegates appropriately .
I'd like to load a font from an external server and once is loaded
Continuing from a previous question , I keep searching for the optimal way to
so the following converts big endians to little ones uint32_t ntoh32(uint32_t v) { return

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.