Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 799781
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:11:11+00:00 2026-05-14T23:11:11+00:00

is it not possible to define a static const array? i would like to

  • 0

is it not possible to define a static const array? i would like to have an optional parameter to a function that is an array of colors,

private static const DEFAULT_COLORS:Array = new Array(0x000000, 0xFFFFFF);

public function myConstructor(colorsArray:Array = DEFAULT_COLORS)
{
}

i know i can use …args but i actually wanting to supply the constructor with 2 separate arrays as option arguments.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:11:11+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:11 pm

    Not possible, but you could this to simulate this behaviour:

    private static const DEFAULT_COLORS:Array = new Array(0x000000, 0xFFFFFF);
    
    public function myConstructor(colorsArray:Array = null)
    {
        colorsArray = colorsArray ? colorsArray : DEFAULT_COLORS;
    }
    

    This will not work if your function is coded in a way such that null could be a valid value (to signal some condition, for instance), but probably that’s not the case here.

    Edit

    If you plan to write to colorsArray in myConstructor, it would be wise to make a copy of DEFAULT_COLORS here:

    colorsArray = colorsArray ? colorsArray : DEFAULT_COLORS.slice();
    

    The reference to the DEFAULT_COLORS Array is constant, but its contents are not, so you could accidentally change your default values.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 524k
  • Answers 524k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't think that this is easily achieved. You can… May 16, 2026 at 10:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The easiest way is to use overloaded procedures: program TestOverloading;… May 16, 2026 at 10:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You add all the files containing the function definitions (function… May 16, 2026 at 10:01 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate Why can't I have a non-integral static const member in a class?
I would like to define inside a class a constant which value is the
I want to have a class with a private static data member: class C
Is it possible to define a large portion, if not the entire, web.config of
From what I understand, #define x y and const int x = y; should
So I have this class public static class MyClass { static MyClass() { ...
Is it possible to use install(TARGETS ...) with targets that are defined in directories
I have functions like this: def activate_field_1(): print 1 def activate_field_2(): print 2 def
I've seen numerous arguments that using a return value is preferable to out parameters.
This is just something that has bothered me for the last couple of days,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.