Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3876310
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T22:22:02+00:00 2026-05-19T22:22:02+00:00

Is it ok to just call throw; from constructor if something goes awry, and

  • 0

Is it ok to just call throw; from constructor if something goes awry, and you have no idea how to recover?

The idea is to let the app crash with a dump, as the state is unknown. Or should you always specify an argument?

From MSDN I only found that it rethrows if there is no argument, but no idea what happens if there is no initial exception to rethrow.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T22:22:02+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 10:22 pm

    If there’s no exception currently being processed throw; will lead to terminate() being called immediately and that will end your program abnormally. That is not very convenient – you’ll have less information about what happened compared to throwing a meaningful exception. You could have thrown a meaningful exception, catch it at the top level (like main()), write some diagnostics and then end the program.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a new web app that is packaged as a WAR as part
My question is about memory use and objects in actionscript 2. If I have
(please excuse that I didn't use aliases). I would like my query output to
I'm working on a project in C# w/ XNA, and I want to reorganize
I am playing with TFS 2010, and am trying to setup a build process
There doesn't seem to be any tried and true set of best practices to
I am using a 3rd-party rotator object, which is providing a smooth, random rotation

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.