Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 60927
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T18:14:19+00:00 2026-05-10T18:14:19+00:00

Is it possible for a generic interface’s type to be based on a specific

  • 0

Is it possible for a generic interface’s type to be based on a specific parent class?

For example:

public interface IGenericFace<T : BaseClass> { } 

Obviously the above code doesn’t work but if it did, what I’m trying to tell the compiler is that T must be a sub-class of BaseClass. Can that be done, are there plans for it, etc.?

I think it would be useful in terms of a specific project, making sure a generic interface/class isn’t used with unintended type(s) at compile time. Or also to sort of self-document: show what kind of type is intended.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T18:14:19+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 6:14 pm
    public interface IGenericFace<T> where T : SomeBaseClass 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to write generic class with one constructor which explicitly defines type
Is it possible to create generic class as following? public class AnyClassTypeWithValue<Class<T>, E> {
Is it possible to use django class based generic views with a ManyToManyField relation?
Originally based on this thread: Spring IoC and Generic Interface Type and this one
I would like to have an interface that allows for a generic type public
Is it possible to create a generic method with a definition similar to: public
I have the following generic question Here is a my generic message interface. public
Is it possible to create a function that returns a generic of unspecified type,
i have interface: public interface Inx<T> { T Set(Data data); } simple class with
is it possible to get a generic (parametrized) method from a non-generic class through

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.