Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7822525
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T07:56:45+00:00 2026-06-02T07:56:45+00:00

Is it possible to adapt unique_ptr for plain c? Perhaps if there is a

  • 0

Is it possible to adapt unique_ptr for plain c?

Perhaps if there is a way of simulating calls to a home made “constructor/destructor” when calling malloc/free?

Is it doable? Or is it just a silly idea?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T07:56:47+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 7:56 am

    The whole point of a “smart pointer” is to do certain tasks automatically on destruction. Since C doesn’t have destructors there’s no way to accomplish this except with explicit function calls – but that’s how you deallocate memory in C already.

    You could possibly make a list of pointers that need to be freed and do them all at the same time with a single function call.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to use or adapt jQuery's .select() to set a selection range
Possible Duplicate: Best way to stop SQL Injection in PHP I am creating a
I am wondering if it is possible to adapt this HTML5 technology in 2D,
Is it possible to somehow adapt a c-style string/buffer ( char* or wchar_t* )
Is there any way to detect change in an integer? Such as creating a
Is it possible to adapt a method like this function F class C {
Is it possible to adopt the use of an O/RM like NHibernate or Entity
Possible Duplicate: Yield In VB.NET In C#, when writing a function that returns an
Possible Duplicates: Why is lock(this) {...} bad? In C# it is common to use
Possible Duplicate: Finding the Variable Name passed to a Function in C# In C#,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.