Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 673227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T00:34:22+00:00 2026-05-14T00:34:22+00:00

Is it possible to allocate locally-scoped memory in assembly? For example, consider the following

  • 0

Is it possible to allocate locally-scoped memory in assembly?

For example, consider the following (completely contrived) situation:

I have two macros, one of which is dependent on the other. The first is:

minimum MACRO dest, num1, num2
; Finds the minimum of two unsigned numbers, stores the result in dest

And the second is:

tripMin MACRO dest, num1, num2, num3
; Finds the minimum of three unsigned numbers, stores the result in dest

minimum firstMin, num1, num2
minimum secondMin, num2, num3
minimum dest, firstMin, secondMin

(I know that this isn’t a realistic example for a variety of reasons, but bear with me.)

Assuming that all the registers are otherwise occupied, is there any way to declare firstMin and secondMin locally within the macro?

Or am I just better off freeing a register by pushing its value onto the stack and popping it back when I’m done?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T00:34:22+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 12:34 am

    locally-scoped memory is a notion that only applies to scoped languages, not assembly.

    If you were to write the same thing as a function in, say C, your temporaries would be stored on the stack (or available registers if there are some, depending on ABI). You can mimic the same thing. How to push/pop values from the stack is dependent on which assembly language you are using though.

    However, this starts to look awfully like a function call.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to allocate an arbitrary memory block using the new operator? In
Is it possible to write a C function that does the following? Allocate a
Is it possible to allocate a 1D memory space int *x=(int *)malloc(100*sizeof(int)); and then
Possible Duplicate: Why would you ever want to allocate memory on the heap rather
Is it possible to allocate 7 bytes of memory and just free the first
Is it possible to dynamically allocate memory on a GPU's Global memory inside the
Possible Duplicate: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 43148176 bytes)
In C++ it is easily possible to have a permanent memory leak - just
Is it possible to allocate virtual memory for a byte array containing a function,
is it possible, in a C/C++ program, to allocate virtual memory (Swap Space) for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.