Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8822095
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T06:01:02+00:00 2026-06-14T06:01:02+00:00

Is it possible to compose an arbitrary function with an Enumerator or EnumeratorM, so

  • 0

Is it possible to compose an arbitrary function with an Enumerator or EnumeratorM, so that each individual item of data being pushed into the iteratee is first preprocessed by applying the function?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T06:01:04+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 6:01 am

    With Scalaz 6 at least, no – not if the function has a return type that is different from (and not a subtype of) its argument type, because EnumeratorM‘s type doesn’t allow it to change the input type of the iteratee.

    However, it is possible to “pre-compose” arbitrary functions with an iteratee, so I think this is the way to go. Could also maybe use an enumeratee, but this abstraction is not provided in Scalaz 6.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Assume that I have a boost::function of with an arbitrary signature called type CallbackType
Is that possible to have a look on the layout for the Compose message
I was wondering if it is possible in a mysql stored-function or stored-procedure compose
How is it possible to encode black/white picture into .wav-file? I know that it
I have a lot of small images like that I want to compose into
Is it possible to compose several fragment shaders in sequence under GLSL ES? I
Possible Duplicate: Can main function call itself in C++? I found this problem very
Is it possible to add a attachment to a mail with the mailto function
Like the title tells: Is it possible to write a PHP-Function in a XSL-Document
I have a button on subject's profile (user that is being viewed), when you

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.