Is it possible to create a trigger that will not be in a transaction?
I want to update data on a linked server with a trigger but due to firewall issues we can’t create a distributed transaction between the two servers.
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Is it possible to create a trigger that will not be in a transaction?
I want to update data on a linked server with a trigger but due to firewall issues we can’t create a distributed transaction between the two servers.
What you probably want is a combination of a queue that contains updates for the linked server and a process that reads data from the queue and updates the remote server. The trigger will then insert a message into the queue as part of the normal transaction. This data will be read by the separate process and used to update the remote server. Logic will needed in the process handle errors (and possibly retries).
The queue can be implemented with one or more tables.