Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3637454
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 19, 20262026-05-19T01:09:37+00:00 2026-05-19T01:09:37+00:00

Is it possible to create an abstract TestCase , that will have some test_*

  • 0

Is it possible to create an abstract TestCase, that will have some test_* methods, but this TestCase won’t be called and those methods will only be used in subclasses? I think I am going to have one abstract TestCase in my test suite and it will be subclassed for a few different implementation of a single interface. This is why all test methods are the some, only one, internal method changes. How can I do it in elegant way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-19T01:09:38+00:00Added an answer on May 19, 2026 at 1:09 am

    I didn’t quite understand what do you plan to do —
    the rule of thumb is “not to be smart with tests” –
    just have them there, plain written.

    But to achieve what you want, if you inherit from unittest.TestCase, whenever you call unittest.main() your “abstract” class will be executed – I think this is the situation you want to avoid.

    Just do this:
    Create your “abstract” class inheriting from “object”, not from TestCase.
    And for the actual “concrete” implementations, just use multiple inheritance:
    inherit from both unittest.TestCase and from your abstract class.

    import unittest
    
    class Abstract(object):
        def test_a(self):
            print "Running for class", self.__class__
    
    class Test(Abstract, unittest.TestCase):
        pass
    
    unittest.main()
    

    update: reversed the inheritance order – Abstract first so that its defintions are not overriden by TestCase defaults, as well pointed in the comments bellow.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

is that possible create an abstract class from DbQuery and IDbSet? I'm trying to
Is it possible to create an abstract method that must return an instance of
I have a base class that is marked as abstract. Is it possible to
Possible Duplicate: Create an alert on any view controller after Facebook request:didFailWithError: I have
Possible Duplicate: Why can’t I create an abstract constructor on an abstract C# class?
Possible Duplicate: Grouping WHERE clauses with Zend_Db_Table_Abstract I need to create something like this:
Is it possible to call an abstract constructor in one method, then pass that
Is it possible to have an entity class which inherits from another (abstract) entity
Possible Duplicate: Why can’t I create an abstract constructor on an abstract C# class?
I'm not sure if this is possible in Spring MVC 3.0, but I'm trying

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.