Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1011389
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T09:13:35+00:00 2026-05-16T09:13:35+00:00

Is it possible to define a dependency in the pom such that it has

  • 0

Is it possible to define a dependency in the pom such that it has the scope of system but points to multiple jars?

I’m sure this is quite unorthodox, however, I was just wondering whether this was even possible. So something like:

<dependency>
  <groupId>foo</groupId>
  <artifactId>foo</artifactId>
  <version>1.0</version>
  <scope>system</scope>
  <systemPath>${basedir}/lib/foo/*.jar</systemPath>
</dependency>
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T09:13:36+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:13 am

    First (and I’ll never repeat it enough), using system scoped dependencies is discouraged unless you know exactly what you’re doing. From Dependency Scopes:

    system: This dependency is required in some phase of your
    project’s lifecycle, but is
    system-specific. Use of this scope
    is discouraged: This is considered an
    “advanced” kind of feature and should
    only be used when you truly understand
    all the ramifications of its use,
    which can be extremely hard if not
    actually impossible to quantify
    .
    This scope by definition renders your
    build non-portable. It may be
    necessary in certain edge cases. The
    system scope includes the
    <systemPath> element which points to
    the physical location of this
    dependency on the local machine. It is
    thus used to refer to some artifact
    expected to be present on the given
    local machine an not in a repository;
    and whose path may vary
    machine-to-machine. The systemPath
    element can refer to environment
    variables in its path: ${JAVA_HOME}
    for instance.

    Now, to strictly answer your question, declaring a dependency with a system scope that would point on several jars is “possible” IF the dependency has a MANIFEST.MF listing other JARs relatively in its Class-Path entry. Something like this (assuming the “root” dependency is in lib):

    Class-Path: ../lib/bar.jar ../lib/foo.jar
    

    But I do NOT recommend this approach, especially in your particular case. Instead, have a look at this previous answer where I describe how to setup a file-based repository.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to define a class in C# such that class GenericCollection<T> :
I'm not sure if this is even possible, but here goes: I have a
Is it possible to define a timestamp column in a MySQL table that will
Is it possible to define a spring-managed EJB3 hibernate listener? I have this definition
It seems that ant dependency management isn't great to say the least... But, is
Possible Duplicate: Define a generic that implements the + operator I am recently working
For instance, is the following possible: #define definer(x) #define #x?
In VBP its possible to define user defined actions by creating a custom COM
Is it possible to define anonymous subroutines in a hash constructor in Perl? I'm
Does anyone know if it possible to define the equivalent of a java custom

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.