Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8181735
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T00:37:21+00:00 2026-06-07T00:37:21+00:00

Is it possible to define an interface (e.g. MyClass Implements MyInterface) whose method/property definitions

  • 0

Is it possible to define an interface (e.g. MyClass Implements MyInterface) whose method/property definitions already match some of the methods/properties defined on a third-party (or a native) class?

For example, the DataRow class has a number of properties/methods that make it “row-like”. What if I want to implement an interface (i.e. IRowLike) that defines certain methods and properties already existing on the native DataRow class (which I cannot directly touch or extend). I simply want the class to agree at runtime that it does indeed abide by some interface.

Interfaces afford a poor-man’s version of “duck typing”. Once I have a set of classes that all abide by a given interface, I can define extension methods against that interface and all classes that support the interface immediately gain new behavior. I know it may seem odd to want to retroactively apply an interface against third-party classes, but it would definitely allows us to do more with less code.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T00:37:23+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 12:37 am

    This isn’t possible in .Net. A type defines the interfaces that it implements in metadata at compile time and its definition isn’t alterable at runtime. It is possible to generate types at runtime which implement specific interfaces but not alter an existing type

    There are some alternatives though. In VB.Net you could simply choose to use late binding on the type and access the interface methods in that manner (or dynamic in C#) The downside of course is the code isn’t statically verifiable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to define an Interface with optional implementation methods? For example I
Possible Duplicate: Define a method that has many (or infinite) arguments I have the
Is it possible to define some sort of capitalize() or toLowerCase() function when creating
Is it possible to define an instance method in ruby from a string (the
Is it possible to define a regex which will match every character except a
I know it's not possible to define a constructor in an interface, but I'm
I like the approach of having property bag objects (DTOs) which define the interface
Probably a simple question. I have an interface (MyInterface) that defines a property like
I have an interface with several method definitions, and I would not like to
Possible Duplicate: Define a generic that implements the + operator I am recently working

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.