Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3455312
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:35:57+00:00 2026-05-18T09:35:57+00:00

Is it possible to define properties that are only available to the class they

  • 0

Is it possible to define properties that are only available to the class they are defined in, and that class’s subclasses?

Stated another way, is there a way to define protected properties?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:35:58+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:35 am

    Technically, no. Properties are really just methods, and all methods are public. The way we “protect” methods in Objective-C is by not letting other people know about them.

    Practically, yes. You can define the properties in a class extension, and still @synthesize them in your main implementation block.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In ant, I have defined some properties that define some paths ( absolute )
Possible Duplicate: Define a method that has many (or infinite) arguments I have the
Possible Duplicate: Is it possible to define enumalpha? Is there any equivalent of Java
At the moment I define the connection properties in a configuration file and only
In PHP, if you define a class, and then instantiate an object of that
I have a class that has some properties. And I want something that calculates
Is it possible to define things externally into Properties files for our annotations on
I know that automatic properties must define a get and set accessor method, I
Is it possible to define an instance method in ruby from a string (the
Is it possible to define a regex which will match every character except a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.