Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 132245
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T06:13:56+00:00 2026-05-11T06:13:56+00:00

Is it possible to do something like this? class A { public virtual string

  • 0

Is it possible to do something like this?

class A {     public virtual string prop     {         get         {             return 'A';         }     } } class B: A {     private string X;     public override string prop     {         get         {             return X;         }         set         {             X = value;         }     } } 

That is, the base class provides a virtual property with only a GET accessor, but the child class overrides the GET and also provides a SET.

The current example doesn’t compile, but perhaps I’m missing something here.

Added: To clarify, no I don’t want to redefine with new. I want to add a new accessor. I know it wasn’t in the base class, so it cannot be overriden. OK, let me try to explain how it would look without the syntactic sugar:

class A {     public virtual string get_prop()     {             return 'A';     } } class B: A {     private string X;     public override string get_prop()     {         return X;     }     public virtual string set_prop()     {         X = value;     } } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T06:13:56+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:13 am

    No, this is not possible. Unfortunately you can not even override and change the accessor level (from protected to public for example), as documented on MSDN. I would recommend that you consider restructuring the code/class slightly and look for an alternative way to accomplish this task such as declaring the set accessor with the protected modifier using a SetProperty method in the derived class.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 154k
  • Answers 154k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think you will have to save it to disk… May 12, 2026 at 10:34 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your resolver may not fire on your new AppDomain, try… May 12, 2026 at 10:34 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I'm trying to solve this exact same problem myself right… May 12, 2026 at 10:34 am

Related Questions

I'm trying to correct the usual IE bugs around CSS 2.1 and need a
I have a template class, C_Foo<T>, which is specialised in a number of ways.
Is it possible to do something like this: class SimulationController < ApplicationController layout generic,
I was wondering if it is possible to do something like this: <uc1:TestControl ID=TestControl1

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.