Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 52027
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:50:33+00:00 2026-05-10T16:50:33+00:00

Is it possible to do something like this? var pattern = /some regex segment/

  • 0

Is it possible to do something like this?

var pattern = /some regex segment/ + /* comment here */     /another segment/; 

Or do I have to use new RegExp() syntax and concatenate a string? I’d prefer to use the literal as the code is both more self-evident and concise.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:50:34+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:50 pm

    Here is how to create a regular expression without using the regular expression literal syntax. This lets you do arbitrary string manipulation before it becomes a regular expression object:

    var segment_part = "some bit of the regexp"; var pattern = new RegExp("some regex segment" + /*comment here */               segment_part + /* that was defined just now */               "another segment"); 

    If you have two regular expression literals, you can in fact concatenate them using this technique:

    var regex1 = /foo/g; var regex2 = /bar/y; var flags = (regex1.flags + regex2.flags).split("").sort().join("").replace(/(.)(?=.*\1)/g, ""); var regex3 = new RegExp(regex1.source + regex2.source, flags); // regex3 is now /foobar/gy 

    It’s just more wordy than just having expression one and two being literal strings instead of literal regular expressions.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 98k
  • Answers 98k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't quite get all of what you're trying to… May 11, 2026 at 7:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer VB.NET 2008 does not have the new[] construct, but VB.NET… May 11, 2026 at 7:31 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer A best practice that many people use when they create… May 11, 2026 at 7:31 pm

Related Questions

I'm running into a common pattern in the code that I'm writing, where I
Is it possible to do something like this: <% Dim foo as string =
I'm trying to create a Fluent Interface to the Winforms Datagrid. This should allow
I've been wondering, what is the point of clog? As near as I can

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.