Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6919775
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T10:02:31+00:00 2026-05-27T10:02:31+00:00

is it possible to express the following Haskell program without FlexibleInstances , i.e. in

  • 0

is it possible to express the following Haskell program without FlexibleInstances, i.e. in pure Haskell2010?

{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances #-}

class    Funk a       where  truth :: a  -> [Bool]
instance Funk [Bool]  where  truth =  \x ->  x
instance Funk Bool    where  truth =  \x -> [x]

instance Funk b => Funk (Bool -> b) where
    truth f = concat [truth (f True), truth (f False)]

This is inspired by the answer on How to write a Haskell function that takes a variadic function as an argument.

I suspect the problem is, that truth returns something else than the function which it takes as an argument (which returns Bool, not [Bool]).

The purpose of this snippet is, to give a list of all evaluations of all possible configuration for a boolean function, i.e.

Main> truth (\x y -> x && y)
[True,False,False,False]

Main> truth (\x y -> x || y)
[True,True,True,False]

In the end, a truth-table is to be printed, like this (see boiler-plate at the end of this post to see the code which produces this):

Main> main
T T T | T
T T F | T
T F T | T
T F F | F
F T T | T
F T F | F
F F T | T
F F F | T

Here is some boiler-plate code for testing and visualizing, what the purpose of this function is:

class TruthTable a where
    truthTable :: Funk f => f -> a

instance TruthTable [String] where
    truthTable f = zipWith (++) (hCells (div (length t) 2)) (map showBool $ truth f)
        where
            showBool True = "| T"
            showBool False = "| F"
            hCells 1 = ["T ", "F "]
            hCells n = ["T " ++ x | x <- hCells (div n 2)] ++ ["F " ++ x | x <- hCells (div n 2)]

instance TruthTable [Char] where
    truthTable f = foldl1 join (truthTable f)
        where join a b = a ++ "\n" ++ b

instance TruthTable (IO a) where
    truthTable f = putStrLn (truthTable f) >> return undefined

main :: IO ()
main = truthTable (\x y z -> x `xor` y ==> z)

xor :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool
xor a b = not $ a == b

(==>) :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool
a ==> b = not $ a && not b
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T10:02:32+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 10:02 am

    No problem:

    class    Funk a                  where  truth :: a  -> [Bool]
    instance (IsBool a) => Funk [a]  where  truth =  map toBool
    instance Funk Bool               where  truth =  \x -> [x]
    
    instance (IsBool a, Funk b) => Funk (a -> b) where
        truth f = concat [truth (f $ fromBool True), truth (f $ fromBool False)]
    
    class IsBool a where
        toBool :: a -> Bool
        fromBool :: Bool -> a
    
    instance IsBool Bool where
        toBool = id
        fromBool = id
    

    You can even make ‘honorary booleans’ if you wish, like Integer with 0 and 1 etc.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to express the following code in such a way that the
Is it possible to express the following SQL query in mongodb: SELECT * FROM
Is it possible to express (mathematical) infinity, positive or negative, in C#? If so,
Is it possible to use LINQ in the express version of visual studio? I
Is it possible to install sql server 2005 express and sql server 2008 developer
It is possible in SQL Server Express have a log of all operations SELECT
Is it possible to use Enterprise Manager 2005 with sqlserver 2005 express? I want
Is it possible to create an installer that includes ms sql express? I currently
In Visual c# Express Edition, is it possible to make some (but not all)
Possible Duplicate: Paypal Checkout Express empty cart problem i have an issue with paypal

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.