Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 837897
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T05:13:00+00:00 2026-05-15T05:13:00+00:00

Is it possible to get the class type from inside the static initialization block?

  • 0

Is it possible to get the class type from inside the static initialization block?

This is a simplified version of what I currently have::

class Person extends SuperClass {

   String firstName;

   static{
      // This function is on the "SuperClass":
      //  I'd for this function to be able to get "Person.class" without me
      //  having to explicitly type it in but "this.class" does not work in 
      //  a static context.
      doSomeReflectionStuff(Person.class);     // IN "SuperClass"
   }
}

This is closer to what I am doing, which is to initialize a data structure that holds information about the object and its annotations, etc… Perhaps I am using the wrong pattern?

public abstract SuperClass{
   static void doSomeReflectionStuff( Class<?> classType, List<FieldData> fieldDataList ){
      Field[] fields = classType.getDeclaredFields();
      for( Field field : fields ){
         // Initialize fieldDataList
      }
   }
}

public abstract class Person {

   @SomeAnnotation
   String firstName;

   // Holds information on each of the fields, I used a Map<String, FieldData>
   //  in my actual implementation to map strings to the field information, but that
   //  seemed a little wordy for this example
   static List<FieldData> fieldDataList = new List<FieldData>();

   static{
      // Again, it seems dangerous to have to type in the "Person.class"
      //   (or Address.class, PhoneNumber.class, etc...) every time.
      //   Ideally, I'd liken to eliminate all this code from the Sub class
      //   since now I have to copy and paste it into each Sub class.
      doSomeReflectionStuff(Person.class, fieldDataList);
   }
}

Edit

I picked the accepted answer based on what applied best to my problem, however it seems to me that all three of the current answers have their merits.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T05:13:00+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 5:13 am

    No, it’s not possible without grabbing the stacktrace (which is imo nastier than your initial approach and for which I would in any way prefer Thread#getStackTrace() above new Exception()).

    Rather do that job in a non-static initializer (or the default constructor) of the abstract class where you check the initialized status.

    public abstract class SuperClass {
    
        {
            if (!isInitialized(getClass())) {
                initialize(getClass());
            }
        }
    
    }
    

    The called methods in turn can be safely static.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 435k
  • Answers 435k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As others have written, I don't think this is possible.… May 15, 2026 at 3:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not sure about the cufon syntax, but try Cufon.set('fontFamily', 'Museo… May 15, 2026 at 3:41 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can absolutely check an empty array's length. However, if… May 15, 2026 at 3:41 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.