Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1016145
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T10:30:21+00:00 2026-05-16T10:30:21+00:00

Is it possible to have a constraint/trigger on a record being entered that checks

  • 0

Is it possible to have a constraint/trigger on a record being entered that checks if the user has entered at least one of three fields (all of which can be null). For example, I have a database being used to track bugs and new features in other pieces of software. When a bug is discovered a Feature record is created which can have three foreign keys, discoveredID, fixedID or newFeatureID, all three can be null (because it could be a discovered bug, fixed bug or a new feature added to the software.) but the user must select at least one when entering data. I can control the input in an external program using my database but if someone else writes a program they may not put that check in place, so I want to stop them doing that and entering corrupt data.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T10:30:22+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 10:30 am

    Using SQL Server, adding a Table level check constraint would suffice.

    CREATE TABLE Bugs (
      discoveredID INTEGER
      , fixedID INTEGER 
      , newFeatureID INTEGER  
      )
    
    ALTER TABLE Bugs ADD CONSTRAINT CKC_AtLeastOne CHECK (COALESCE(discoveredID, fixedID, newFeatureID) IS NOT NULL)
    
    INSERT INTO Bugs VALUES (NULL, NULL, 1)
    INSERT INTO Bugs VALUES (NULL, 1, NULL)
    INSERT INTO Bugs VALUES (1, NULL, NULL)
    INSERT INTO Bugs VALUES (NULL, NULL, NULL) -- Fails
    
    DROP TABLE Bugs
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: How do I create unique constraint that also allows nulls in sql
Is it possible to see the DML (SQL Statement) that is being run that
Possible Duplicate: Solution for overloaded operator constraint in .NET generics I have a problem
Is is possible in SQL Server 2008 to create such a constraint that would
I have three following tables. The relationship is that each report_param and report_frequency is
Is it possible to have a MySQLi prepared statement within the fetch() call of
Is it possible to have XML-embedded JavaScript executed to assist in client-side (browser-based) XSL
Is it possible to have a <div> simultaneously (1) not take up all available
Is it possible to have an anonymous type implement an interface? I've got a
Is it possible to have transport security without authentication? I'm well aware of it's

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.