Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7649219
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T10:54:31+00:00 2026-05-31T10:54:31+00:00

Is it possible to have a HashTable that automatically removes the oldest accessed element

  • 0

Is it possible to have a HashTable that automatically removes the oldest accessed element from the list? I’m trying to build a validation cache but I’m concerned about the possibility that I could be bombarded with requests and my Hashtable getting too big in memory. I looked into the size, but sounds like the cache automatically doubles in size when the treshold is reached. Of course, the other option is to just build queue or stack in memory but that wouldn’t be efficient for lookups.

Is there a better way to maintain a cache in memory? My table would be pretty simple, storing a string and a bool against it. Any other ideas?

Thanks,
kosh

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T10:54:33+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 10:54 am

    Use System.Web.Caching.Cache instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a hash table that I want to store to disk. The list
I have a JSON file that I would like to create an array from.
I have three Hash Table like that, HashTable ht1 = { (1, 100), (2,
I have a program that captures live data from a piece of hardware on
I am currently trying to build a small system that read's in a bunch
Possible Duplicate: How do you create a Perl module? I have the script that
I have an object, MySession , that has a hashtable for storing arbitrary properties
Is it possible to convert an IQuery that is returned from Nhibernate to a
Is it possible have two projects with the same name in flex builder? Here
is possible to have a separator between elements of a GridView? Thanks

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.