Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 871935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T10:42:43+00:00 2026-05-15T10:42:43+00:00

Is it possible to have final transient fields that are set to any non-default

  • 0

Is it possible to have final transient fields that are set to any non-default value after serialization in Java? My usecase is a cache variable — that’s why it is transient. I also have a habit of making Map fields that won’t be changed (i.e. contents of the map is changed, but object itself remains the same) final. However, these attributes seem to be contradictory — while compiler allows such a combination, I cannot have the field set to anything but null after unserialization.

I tried the following, without success:

  • simple field initialization (shown in the example): this is what I normally do, but the initialization doesn’t seem to happen after unserialization;
  • initialization in constructor (I believe this is semantically the same as above though);
  • assigning the field in readObject() — cannot be done since the field is final.

In the example cache is public only for testing.

import java.io.*;
import java.util.*;

public class test
{
    public static void main (String[] args) throws Exception
    {
        X  x = new X ();
        System.out.println (x + " " + x.cache);

        ByteArrayOutputStream  buffer = new ByteArrayOutputStream ();
        new ObjectOutputStream (buffer).writeObject (x);
        x = (X) new ObjectInputStream (new ByteArrayInputStream (buffer.toByteArray ())).readObject ();
        System.out.println (x + " " + x.cache);
    }

    public static class X implements Serializable
    {
        public final transient Map <Object, Object>  cache = new HashMap <Object, Object> ();
    }
}

Output:

test$X@1a46e30 {}
test$X@190d11 null
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T10:42:44+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 10:42 am

    The short answer is “no” unfortunately – I’ve often wanted this. but transients cannot be final.

    A final field must be initialized either by direct assignment of an initial value or in the constructor. During deserialization, neither of these are invoked, so initial values for transients must be set in the ‘readObject()’ private method that’s invoked during deserialization. And for that to work, the transients must be non-final.

    (Strictly speaking, finals are only final the first time they are read, so there are hacks that are possible that assign a value before it is read, but for me this is going one step too far.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a java class that looks like public class MyClass { private final
Is it possible to have a free iPhone app that has say an initial
I have set of constants like: public static final String CONST1=abc; public static final
Possible Duplicate: Java socket sends some data during connection to server I have two
Possible Duplicate: Cannot refer to a non-final variable inside an inner class defined in
I'm writing a piece of java software that has to make the final judgement
Possible Duplicate: How to concatenate two arrays in Java? I have SET1 declared as
Is it possible to have growing files on amazon s3? That is, can i
I have found as a common issue in any of my apps that the
Is it possible have two projects with the same name in flex builder? Here

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.