Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 422843
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T19:07:17+00:00 2026-05-12T19:07:17+00:00

Is it possible to have several consumers listening on a single MSMQ instance and

  • 0

Is it possible to have several consumers listening on a single MSMQ instance and use the Selective Consumer interface for having each one deal with a distinct subset of the messages? I can’t seem to get this scenario to work correctly using pub/sub – a single consumer on the queue works fine, but when using >1 consumers (several instances of the same executable) no messages appear anywhere. As I understand it, this is not the case of ‘competing consumers’, since only a single consumer will process a single message.

Any help or pointers are appreciated.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T19:07:17+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:07 pm

    If you are using MassTransit to dispatch messages from an MSMQ queue, it is recommended that the queue is local to the box.

    That being said, if you have multiple processes that are reading from the same queue for the purposes of distributing the message load, you can use the selective receive to only consume messages in each instance that are relevant to that process.

    For example, if you have multiple instances of an application that send messages to a service and that service responds with a correlated message, you can subscribe to the correlated message by identifier and only those subscribed messages will be delivered. The messages that are not selected will remain in the queue until processed by any of the processes that are interested.

    Because of this pattern, it is highly recommended that an expiration be set on the message so ignored responses do not clog up the queue over time.

    This scenario is pretty common when replicating a request/response pattern via messaging.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to have an anonymous type implement an interface? I've got a
Is it possible to have multiple listeners to messages carried by MSMQ? WCF appears
I have several one-line binding already written and I'd like to keep it that
I have several launch configurations in Eclipse each launching the same Java program but
I have several vehicles equiped each with individual GPS tracker sending NMEA stream to
Is it possible to have a MySQLi prepared statement within the fetch() call of
Is it possible to have XML-embedded JavaScript executed to assist in client-side (browser-based) XSL
Is it possible to have a <div> simultaneously (1) not take up all available
Is it possible to have transport security without authentication? I'm well aware of it's
Is it possible to have both NetTcp bound endpoints, and basicHttp bound endpoints with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.