Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 684197
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T01:47:24+00:00 2026-05-14T01:47:24+00:00

Is it possible to hide certain functions/fields from displaying in javascript intellisense drop down

  • 0

Is it possible to hide certain functions/fields from displaying in javascript intellisense drop down list in Visual Studio 2008? Either by javascript documentaion XML of by naming privates in a certain way?

I’ve seen <private /> in jquery vsdoc file that implies exactly this behaviour, but doesn’t meet my expectations

{
    __hiddenField: 0,
    /// <private />
    increment: function(){
        /// <summary>Increments a private variable</summary>
        __hiddenField++;
    }
}

But since fields can’t contain documentation (because they have no body) they have to be documented at the top. But still doesn’t work:

{
    /// <field name="__hiddenField" type="Number" private="true">PRIVATE USE</field>
    __hiddenField: 0,
    increment: function(){
        /// <summary>Increments a private variable</summary>
        __hiddenField++;
    }
}

Impossible is a perfectly possible answer and will be accepted if you have the knowledge that it’s actually not possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T01:47:25+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 1:47 am

    I’m not sure about how to hide it from intellisense, but you could always use closures to hide the variable completely, like this:

    (function(){
        var hiddenField = 0;
    
        // not sure how you're defining your object; 
        // I'll just assume a global variable
        window.something = {
            increment: function(){
                /// <summary>Increments a private variable</summary>
                hiddenField++;
            }
        }
    })();
    

    That creates an anonymous function around your definition, so window.something.increment() will work, and “hiddenField” is truly hidden.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 384k
  • Answers 384k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer you can normally use @class to resolve circular dependencies if… May 14, 2026 at 11:09 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Python documentation uses reST for its markup, but it… May 14, 2026 at 11:09 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The ++ is applied on the pointer d, not on… May 14, 2026 at 11:09 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.