Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 579835
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T14:24:29+00:00 2026-05-13T14:24:29+00:00

Is it possible to implement a ! (not) using expression trees. I’m interested in

  • 0

Is it possible to implement a ! (not) using expression trees. I’m interested in creating a C# eval class which will parse and evaluate logical expressions which contain true, false, ||, && and !. I know that && and || are currently supported by .NET 4 expression trees, but I was wondering if their is a way to implement summat like !(x && y) || z where z=false, y=true and z=false.

Currently I’m using a standard stack based tokenizer, parser, evaluator to evaluate these types of expression but would happly dump it, if a suitable expression tree could be created and executed on the fly.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T14:24:30+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 2:24 pm

    I usually find that it’s worth coding a lambda expression which does what I want, and then seeing what the C# compiler does with it.

    So this code:

    Expression<Func<bool,bool>> func = x => !x;
    

    Is compiled into:

    ParameterExpression expression2;
    Expression<Func<bool, bool>> expression = 
           Expression.Lambda<Func<bool, bool>>(Expression.Not(
                expression2 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(bool), "x")), 
                    new ParameterExpression[] { expression2 });
    

    (Apologies for the formatting – it’s hard to know what to do with that.)

    That’s decompiled with Reflector, but with its “optimization” set at .NET 2.0 to avoid it using lambda syntax.

    Once you’ve got past the junk, you’ll see it’s using Expression.Not. && uses Expression.AndAlso, and || uses Expression.OrElse.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 316k
  • Answers 316k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer public static string ToHex(this byte[] bytes, bool upperCase) { StringBuilder… May 13, 2026 at 11:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The EndXxx methods generated for a service reference have the… May 13, 2026 at 11:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your assumptions are correct. Transient objects are not tracked in… May 13, 2026 at 11:27 pm

Related Questions

I'm using T4 for generating repositories for LINQ to Entities entities. The repository contains
Many times I hear that F# is not suited to particular tasks, such as
I have a bunch of classes that each have a property called Sequence. This
Suppose you are using the ternary operator, or the null coalescing operator, or nested
Edit 2: For a practical demonstration of why this remains important, look no further

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.