Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7410029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T06:10:11+00:00 2026-05-29T06:10:11+00:00

Is it possible to initialize a variable from a return parameter (by ref)? Say

  • 0

Is it possible to initialize a variable from a return parameter (by ref)? Say I have something like:

Car c;    // <- don't want to create a new Car here!
if (findCar("beetle", c)) {
    ...
}

where if findCar succeeds, it returns true and fills c:

bool findCar(string name, Car& out) {
    ...
    // return true if found
    out = thecar;
    return true;
}

Now, my class Car doesn’t have a 0-argument constructor, so the above code fails to compile. Is there a way to keep c uninitialized until the call to findCar?

Solutions I thought of are:

  • adding a cheap 0-argument constructor to Car
  • switch to pointers (which I’d rather avoid)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T06:10:12+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 6:10 am

    Sort of. The problem is that a reference absolutely must refer to an actual object. So, if you return by reference then someone must create an object for that returned reference. Therefore if you can’t find a matching object, it’s not really meaningful to return a reference. If you pass a reference in, then you must create an object first, for the argument to refer to.

    You could work around this for example as follows:

    Car &findCar(const string &name) {
        ...
        // return if found, else throw
        if (found it) {
            return thecar; // assuming `thecar` means some already-existing object,
                           // if it's a local variable then return by value!
        } else  {
            throw std::runtime_error(name);
        }
    }
    

    Caller does:

    Car c = findCar("beetle");
    

    or Car &c = findCar("beetle"); if they want to “see” the actual object found rather than a copy of it. If findCar wants callers to only ever see a copy, not some internal object, then of course you can return by value rather than by reference – the difference is one & in the function signature.

    And someone somewhere has to handle the exception.

    If you’d prefer to avoid exceptions then the right thing to return from a find function is a pointer (or other iterator). It’s what the standard containers and algorithms do when searching, and there are special values (end iterators, or you could use null pointers) that mean “not found”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: Should I initialize variable within constructor or outside constructor I have here
Is it possible to create an attribute that can be initialized with a variable
In C++ you can initialize a variable in an if statement, like so: if
is it possible to initialize a variable by incrementing it? Here's an example of
I would like to know how if it is possible to initialize some static
Is it possible to initialize a variable in view using razor and then manipulate
Is it possible to create a dynamic variable in PHP based on the value
Why is not possible to initialize a property to a function when you declare
In C++, it's not possible to initialize array members in the initialization list, thus
Is it possible in c# to initialize an array in, for example, subindex 1?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.