Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6227119
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T09:09:32+00:00 2026-05-24T09:09:32+00:00

Is it possible to initialize objects of one class in the constructor of another

  • 0

Is it possible to initialize objects of one class in the constructor of another class in c++? I usually will declare objects only in the main(), however I am curious to know if this is possible and a good practice. What are the implications with “new” and a case without “new” operator. Where does it get destroyed?

e.g. Assuming one namespace and an example with “new” operator

class A{
private:
protected:
int *w, int *h;
public:
A(){
 w = new int;
 h = new int;
 };
virtual int area (return ((*w)*(*h)) ;)
virtual ~A()
 {
  delete w;
  delete h;
 }
}

class B{
public:
B()
{
 A a1; // This is usually in the main();
 // Is this good practice
 //Where will the object be destroyed
}
virtual ~B();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T09:09:33+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:09 am

    About your actual question, yes this is perfectly good practice (as far as declaring A inside B’s constructor goes). This will work and properly call A’s destructor.

    However: About the code snippet you posted, allocating two objects in A’s constructor is not good practice. If operator new for h fails, then w will be leaked. A’s destructor will not be called if an exception is thrown inside its constructor. Thus, w will not be deleted if new int throws for h.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why is not possible to initialize a property to a function when you declare
Possible Duplicate: Should I initialize variable within constructor or outside constructor I have here
Given two classes, creating an object of each class in one another results in
In C++, it's not possible to initialize array members in the initialization list, thus
Is it possible in c# to initialize an array in, for example, subindex 1?
Is it possible to do the following (e.g. initialize bool array and set all
Possible Duplicate: NAnt or MSBuild, which one to choose and when? What is the
Possible Duplicate: c++ multithread I use c++ to implement a thread class. The code
In order to implement auto-vivification of Ruby hash, one can employ the following class
Using Google app engine, is it possible to initialize a globally accessible singleton on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.