Home/ Questions/Q 8681905
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-12T21:37:49+00:00

Is it possible to modify users’ HTTP request to www.example.com/options instead of www.example.com/options_and_params My

  • 0

Is it possible to modify users’ HTTP request to 

www.example.com/options

instead of 

www.example.com/options_and_params

My scenario is that about 30000 users connect to my company’s network backbone and I want to add one or more server (with the code I’m current working on) between the backbone switches and Radware LoadProof to achieve this work.

After googling all the night, I have no lead but some more questions:

  1. I don’t need to intercept every packet through the network. With some helps like iptables, I can filter out the package I want. I have done it before using iptables. However, packet is not equal to HTTP stream. Do I need to do HTTP re-construct?
  2. If I successfully find a way to modify HTTP request URL content, I still should put it back to network stream. As I know TCP packets have a checksum and after I modify the content it must be wrong. How do I calculate a new checksum and put the packet back to network?

It’s my first time to do network programming or packet processing develop. Any suggestion is appreciate.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This depends on whether you are doing HTTP/1.0 or HTTP/1.1 and whether its an initial request you need to modify or all requests in a single HTTP 1.1 session.

    If you have the packet and can modify it before it is sent on and you are trying to modify just the request then given the length of a typical packet and the location of the URL in the HTTP request stream (very near the beginning) and the fact that it will be the first thing sent in the TCP stream I think you can fairly safely assume that it will be present in the first N bytes of the first packet sent and therefore won’t be split over multiple packets.

    However, if this is an HTTP/1.1 stream then multiple requests will be being sent via the same TCP connection in which case in future requests the URL may well be split over two TCP packets.

    If you can maybe force HTTP/1.0 or possibly if you modify the initial or all requests to be HTTP/1.0 then you can be pretty sure that the first packet will correspond to the first packet of the TCP stream and that you are very unlikely to see the URL split over multiple packets, meaning no reconstruction and the ability to just do a replace.

    However this will come at a cost of new TCP connections which is pretty inefficient.

    If you don’t and you leave it as HTTP/1.1 then the URL could be at any random point in any future request and therefore split over multiple TCP packets (two realistically given the size of the URL).

    • 0