Question

Is it possible to peek next element in a container which the iterator currently points to without changing the iterator?

For example in std::set,

int myArray[]= {1,2,3,4};
set <int> mySet(myArray, myArray+4);
set <int>::iterator iter = mySet.begin();

//peek the next element in set without changing iterator.

mySet.erase(iter); //erase the element if next element is n+1

Answer 1

Not with iterators in general. An iterator isn’t guaranteed to be able to operate non-destructively. The classic example is an Input Iterator that actually represents an underlying input stream.

There’s something that works for this kind of iterator, though. A Forward Iterator doesn’t invalidate previous copies of itself by the act of moving forward through the collection. Most iterators (including those for STL collections) are at least Forward Iterators, if not a more functional version- only Input Iterators or Output Iterators are more restricted. So you can simply make a copy of your iterator, increment the copy and check that, then go back to your original iterator.

So your peek code:

set <int>::iterator dupe = iter;
++dupe;
// (do stuff with dupe)