Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 57863
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T17:45:28+00:00 2026-05-10T17:45:28+00:00

Is it possible to prevent stack allocation of an object and only allow it

  • 0

Is it possible to prevent stack allocation of an object and only allow it to be instiated with ‘new’ on the heap?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T17:45:29+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 5:45 pm

    One way you could do this would be to make the constructors private and only allow construction through a static method that returns a pointer. For example:

    class Foo { public:     ~Foo();     static Foo* createFoo()     {         return new Foo();     } private:     Foo();     Foo(const Foo&);     Foo& operator=(const Foo&); }; 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to prevent an asp.net Hyperlink control from linking, i.e. so that
Is it possible to prevent the browser from following redirects when sending XMLHttpRequest-s (i.e.
Is it possible to use a CHECK constraint to prevent any date that falls
Is it possible in a Compact Framework application to prevent the garbage collector from
Is it possible to 'hide' a column in an Oracle 10g database, or prevent
Possible Duplicate: Why not use tables for layout in HTML? Under what conditions should
Possible Duplicate: NAnt or MSBuild, which one to choose and when? What is the
Possible Duplicate: How do I calculate someone's age in C#? Maybe this could be
Possible Duplicate: .NET - What’s the best way to implement a catch all exceptions

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.