Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 863523
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T09:19:32+00:00 2026-05-15T09:19:32+00:00

Is it possible to send nothing to an object? Let me elaborate. For instance

  • 0

Is it possible to send nothing to an object?

Let me elaborate. For instance I could have something like this:

val = some_stack.include?(some_val) ? some_val : nil

obj1.obj2.send(val).obj3.obj4

The above call wont’t work because nil is not a symbol. So the solution is:

if val.nil?
  obj1.obj2.obj3.obj4
else
  obj1.obj2.send(val).obj3.obj4
end

However I’m not too fond of this. Is there any other way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T09:19:33+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:19 am

    I’m not aware of any method that returns self without taking any arguments (but I might be overlooking something), but there’s no reason you couldn’t monkeypatch one into the class you’re using:

    irb(main)> class Object
    irb(main)>   def ignore
    irb(main)>     self
    irb(main)>   end
    irb(main)> end
    => nil
    irb(main)> msg = nil
    => nil
    irb(main)> 'hi'.send(msg || :ignore).upcase
    => "HI"
    irb(main)> msg = :reverse
    => :reverse
    irb(main)> 'hi'.send(msg || :ignore).upcase
    => "IH"
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.