Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6031417
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T05:10:51+00:00 2026-05-23T05:10:51+00:00

Is it possible to somehow pass the scope of a function to another? For

  • 0

Is it possible to somehow pass the scope of a function to another?

For example,

function a(){
   var x = 5;
   var obj = {..};
   b(<my-scope>);
}

function b(){
   //access x or obj....
}

I would rather access the variables directly, i.e., not using anything like this.a or this.obj, but just use x or obj directly.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T05:10:52+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 5:10 am

    The only way to truly get access to function a‘s private scope is to declare b inside of a so it forms a closure that allows implicit access to a‘s variables.

    Here are some options for you.

    Direct Access

    1. Declare b inside of a.

      function a() {
         var x = 5,
            obj = {};
         function b(){
            // access x or obj...
         }
         b();
      }
      
      a();
      
    2. If you don’t want b inside of a, then you could have them both inside a larger container scope:

      function container() {
         var x, obj;
         function a(){
            x = 5;
            obj = {..};
            b();
         }
         function b(){
            // access x or obj...
         }
      }
      
      container.a();
      

    These are the only ways you’re going to be able to use a‘s variables directly in b without some extra code to move things around. If you are content with a little bit of “help” and/or indirection, here are a few more ideas.

    Indirect Access

    1. You can just pass the variables as parameters, but won’t have write access except to properties of objects:

      function a() {
         var x = 5,
            obj = {};
         b(x, obj);
      }
      
      function b(x, obj){
         // access x or obj...
         // changing x here won't change x in a, but you can modify properties of obj
      }
      
      a();
      

      As a variation on this you could get write access by passing updated values back to a like so:

      // in a:
      var ret = b(x, obj);
      x = ret.x;
      obj = ret.obj;
      
      // in b:
      return {x : x, obj : obj};
      
    2. You could pass b an object with getters and setters that can access a‘s private variables:

      function a(){
         var x = 5,
            obj = {..},
            translator = {
               getX : function() {return x;},
               setX : function(value) {x = value;},
               getObj : function() {return obj;},
               setObj : function(value) {obj = value;}
            };
         b(translator);
      }
      
      function b(t){
         var x = t.getX(),
            obj = t.getObj();
      
         // use x or obj...
         t.setX(x);
         t.setObj(obj);
      
         // or you can just directly modify obj's properties:
         obj.key = value;
      }
      
      a();
      

      The getters and setters could be public, assigned to the this object of a, but this way they are only accessible if explicitly given out from within a.

    3. And you could put your variables in an object and pass the object around:

      function a(){
         var v = {
            x : 5,
            obj : {}
         };
         b(v);
      }
      
      function b(v){
         // access v.x or v.obj...
         // or set new local x and obj variables to these and use them.
      }
      
      a();
      

      As a variation you can construct the object at call time instead:

      function a(){
         var x = 5,
            obj = {};
         b({x : x, obj: obj});
      }
      
      function b(v){
         // access v.x or v.obj...
         // or set new local x and obj variables to these and use them.
      }
      
      a();
      
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

is it somehow possible to call a rails function or to access a rails
Is it possible somehow to ask the user to allow cross-domain access instead of
Is it somehow possible to identify unused variables in a PHP file in Emacs?
Is it somehow possible to extend a type, wich is defined in another assembly,
I was wondering if it is possible somehow to pass meta data, such as
Is it possible to somehow use a pipeline to pass in the last argument
is following somehow possible? And if so how?! I know i could pass a
I'm wondering is it possible somehow? sample code class CustomFilter { ... function FilterData($data,
Is it possible somehow to close StreamReader after calling ReadToEnd method in construction like
while debugging a C++ program with GDB, is it possible somehow to add comments

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.