Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 224275
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T19:18:05+00:00 2026-05-11T19:18:05+00:00

Is it possible to somehow shorten this statement? if (obj != null) obj.SomeMethod(); because

  • 0

Is it possible to somehow shorten this statement?

if (obj != null)
    obj.SomeMethod();

because I happen to write this a lot and it gets pretty annoying. The only thing I can think of is to implement Null Object pattern, but that’s not what I can do every time and it’s certainly not a solution to shorten syntax.

And similar problem with events, where

public event Func<string> MyEvent;

and then invoke

if (MyEvent != null)
    MyEvent.Invoke();
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T19:18:05+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:18 pm

    From C# 6 onwards, you can just use:

    MyEvent?.Invoke();
    

    or:

    obj?.SomeMethod();
    

    The ?. is the null-propagating operator, and will cause the .Invoke() to be short-circuited when the operand is null. The operand is only accessed once, so there is no risk of the “value changes between check and invoke” problem.

    ===

    Prior to C# 6, no: there is no null-safe magic, with one exception; extension methods – for example:

    public static void SafeInvoke(this Action action) {
        if(action != null) action();
    }
    

    now this is valid:

    Action act = null;
    act.SafeInvoke(); // does nothing
    act = delegate {Console.WriteLine("hi");}
    act.SafeInvoke(); // writes "hi"
    

    In the case of events, this has the advantage of also removing the race-condition, i.e. you don’t need a temporary variable. So normally you’d need:

    var handler = SomeEvent;
    if(handler != null) handler(this, EventArgs.Empty);
    

    but with:

    public static void SafeInvoke(this EventHandler handler, object sender) {
        if(handler != null) handler(sender, EventArgs.Empty);
    }
    

    we can use simply:

    SomeEvent.SafeInvoke(this); // no race condition, no null risk
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 266k
  • Answers 266k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do it in javascript. Suppose you have start… May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Open the properties for the file in the App_Code folder,… May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Adding the type to the name of the variable is… May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm

Related Questions

Is it possible to somehow shorten this code: var i=GetStringFromServer('/url'); if(i){ $('#Div1').hide(); $('#Div2').show(); }
Is it possible to define the tab-width when whitespace is displayed (say within a
Is it possible to somehow use a .bat file to script the schema and/or
Is it possible to somehow mark a System.Array as immutable. When put behind a

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.