Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6835041
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T23:11:07+00:00 2026-05-26T23:11:07+00:00

Is it possible to store multiple data types in a data variable, for instance

  • 0

Is it possible to store multiple data types in a data variable, for instance char *?

Take this example, it prints val1 (an integer), and val3 to val5 (chars), but prints 0 for the second integer, and 0.00 for the float.

Any clues as how to do this?

Any help appreciated.

#include <iostream>

static void printData(char *what) {

    int val1, val2, counter = 0;
    char val3, val4, val5;
    float val6;

    val1 = *((int *)what+counter);
    counter += sizeof(int);
    val2 = *((int *)what+counter);
    counter += sizeof(int);
    val3 = *((char *)what+counter);
    counter += sizeof(char);
    val4 = *((char *)what+counter);
    counter += sizeof(char);
    val5 = *((char *)what+counter);
    counter += sizeof(char);
    val6 = *((float *)what+counter);

    printf("val1 = %d, val2 = %d, val3-5 = %c%c%c, val6 = %.2f", val1, val2, val3, val4, val5, val6);

}

int main (int argc, const char *argv[]) {

    char *data = (char *)malloc((sizeof(int) * 2) + (sizeof(char) * 3) + sizeof(float));

    int integer = 4, secondInteger = 56;
    char test[3] = { 't', 'e', 's' };
    float floatValue = 3.14f;

    int counter = 0;

    *(data) = integer;
    counter += sizeof(int);
    *(data + counter) = secondInteger;
    counter += sizeof(int);
    *(data + counter) = test[0];
    counter += 1;
    *(data + counter) = test[1];
    counter += 1;
    *(data + counter) = test[2];
    counter += 1;
    *(data + counter) = floatValue;

    printData(data);

    return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T23:11:07+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 11:11 pm

    Hmmm malloc quirks. I get the same thing as you when I try this on my machine. Oddly though, when I move the casting outside the pointer increment, I get the correct value for secondInteger (56) but still 0.00 for floatValue. Not really sure what explains this behavior, but I bet it has something to do with byte alignment. I’ll need to think about it more.

    #include <iostream>
    
    static void printData(char *what) {
    
        int val1, val2, counter = 0;
        char val3, val4, val5;
        float val6;
    
        val1 = *(int*)(what+counter);
        counter += sizeof(int);
        val2 = *(int*)(what+counter);
        counter += sizeof(int);
        val3 = *(char*)(what+counter);
        counter += sizeof(char);
        val4 = *(char*)(what+counter);
        counter += sizeof(char);
        val5 = *(char*)(what+counter);
        counter += sizeof(char);
        val6 = *(float*)(what+counter);
    
        printf("val1 = %d, val2 = %d, val3-5 = %c%c%c, val6 = %.2f", val1, val2, val3, val4, val5, val6);
    
    }
    

    Like aib, I’d say to use structs, but since you’re using malloc, you probably know already to use structs and are just asking this to see why it exhibits this behavior 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to store a type name as a C++ variable? For example,
Is it possible, via Adobe Air, to save multiple types of data in a
A few days ago, I asked why its not possible to store binary data,
is it possible to store multiple datatypes in an array, if not, what could
Is it possible to implement batching of multiple stored procedure calls (doing updates/deletes) in
Is it possible to store encrypted connection string so it can be used from
Is it possible to store passwords on the local system (Windows XP) that can
Is it possible to store the results of a call to exec sp_executesql in
Is it possible to store erb templates in database? How?
Is it possible to store the credentials that I use to connect to my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.