Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 810201
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T00:50:49+00:00 2026-05-15T00:50:49+00:00

Is it possible to test that a property setter has not been called using

  • 0

Is it possible to test that a property setter has not been called using Rhino Mocks 3.5?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T00:50:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:50 am

    This is entirely possible:

    public class OneProperty
    {
        virtual public int MyInt
        {
            get;
            set;
        }
    }
    
    [Test]
    public void IntWasSet()
    {
        var prop = Rhino.Mocks.MockRepository.GenerateMock<OneProperty>();
    
        prop.MyInt = 5;
    
        prop.AssertWasNotCalled(x => x.MyInt = Arg<int>.Is.Anything);
    
        prop.VerifyAllExpectations();
    }
    

    Running this test on Rhino Mocks 3.5 results in the following error:

    Errors and Failures: 1) Test Error :
    InterfacerTests.TestMatchesInterface.IntWasSet
    Rhino.Mocks.Exceptions.ExpectationViolationException
    : Expected that
    OneProperty.set_MyInt(anything); would
    not be called, but it was found on the
    actual calls made on the mocked
    object.

    I discovered the Arg<T> syntax from this part of the Rhino documentation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.