Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8262551
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T03:47:31+00:00 2026-06-08T03:47:31+00:00

is it possible to write a wrapper function for methods? >>> lowtide = [

  • 0

is it possible to write a wrapper function for methods?

>>> lowtide = [ 'oh', 'i', 'do', 'like', 'to', 'be', 'beside', 'the', 'seaside' ]

>>> [ x.capitalize() for x in lowtide ]
['Oh', 'I', 'Do', 'Like', 'To', 'Be', 'Beside', 'The', 'Seaside']

>>> list(map(lambda x: x.capitalize(), lowtide))
['Oh', 'I', 'Do', 'Like', 'To', 'Be', 'Beside', 'The', 'Seaside']


>>> def mef(m):
...     def _mef(m,x):
...         return x.m()
...     return partial(_mef, m)
... 
>>> list(map(mef(capitalize), lowtide))

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'capitalize' is not defined
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T03:47:32+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:47 am

    Although you can use str.capitalize and unicode.capitalize, these can fail if you assume a certain type… The safest method is to just use:

    from operator import methodcaller
    capitalize = methodcaller('capitalize')
    

    Which guarantees the correct method is used for the object, and also allows duck typing to be done successfully.

    excerpt from a post from me to Google Groups/comp.lang.python 23 Aug 2010

    Using methodcaller allows you to ‘preserve’ Python’s duck-typing as
    well as any over-ridden methods in subclasses. In your example, this
    is probably overkill as you’re only dealing with one class

    Another (convoluted) example:

    class mystr(str):
        def lower(self):
            return self.upper()
    
    >>> s = mystr('abc')
    >>> s.lower()
    'ABC'
    
    >>> lower = methodcaller('lower')
    >>> lower(s)
    'ABC'
    
    >>> str.lower(s)
    'abc'
    

    ^^^ Most likely incorrect

    It also adds a further bit of flexibility (which can be emulated with
    functools.partial admittedly):

    split_tab = methodcaller('split', '\t')
    split_comma = methodcaller('split', ',')
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Possible Duplicate: .NET file system wrapper library I would like to write a test
Would it be possible to write a wrapper or style simple_form so that form
I would like to write wrapper for STL iterator. It should only change behavior
Is that possible to define a function without referencing to self this way? def
Is it conceptually possible to write a small wrapper library based on std::thread (and
I'm trying to write some wrapper class or function that allows me to execute
Is possible to write language agnostic Robotium tests? For example, if you use a
Is it possible to write GLSL ES fragment shaders under iOS that generate multiple
Is it possible to write a method in Scala which returns an object of
Is it possible to write generic class with one constructor which explicitly defines type

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.